REAL CONSERVATIVES Seventh Annual Ugly Pageant

[Raya @ REAL CONSERVATIVES]

.

LIBERAL LADIES vs CONSERVATIVE

....and the winner is

Marine Corps Ends Female Infantry Officer Program Without A Single Graduate

By Rachel Stoltzfoos

An 18 month trial period allowing female Marines to attend the Marine Corps’ Infantry Officer Course will end without a single female graduate, reported the Marine Corps Times.

The opportunity for female volunteers is part of a larger effort to determine the feasibility of allowing female officers to take part in ground combat operations. If anyone had successfully completed the course, they would not have earned the occupational designator or entered the infantry, since the program was only an experiment. (RELATED: Army Bending Over Backward To Kind Of Appease Women)

The IOC began accepting female officers in September 2012, but by July 2014, only 20 female officers had volunteered, and none had completed the course. Only one volunteer made it through the initial Combat Endurance Test. (RELATED: Female Marine: Women Do Not Belong In Marine Corps Infantry)

In October 2014 the Marine Corps broadened the requirements for applicants to encourage more volunteers, making hundreds more Marines eligible. But new applicants also had to have a first-class score on the male-version of the Physical Fitness Test.

RELATED: Should Women Be Serving In Combat? [PODCAST]

Seven more women volunteered, and three managed to pass the Combat Endurance Test, but none successfully completed the course.

The most recent and final course began April 2 with two female officers, but both were dropped the first day after failing to complete the Combat Endurance Test, a spokesperson for Headquarters Marine Corps told the Marine Corps Times.

The goal was for 100 women to complete the course, but only 29 in total made an attempt, and none of them passed.

The number of volunteers, their pass rate and their performance will be considered along with other data, such as the success rate for female Marines in completing a separate Infantry training course in North Carolina.

The information will be compiled for Commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr., who will make a recommendation to the Department of Defense on whether to allow female troops to take part in ground combat operations.

Read more: http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/marine-corps-ends-female-infantry... 
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter | libertarianrepublic on Facebook

WHO'S PRETTIER?

VOTE NOW:

[Chris Horne]

Ofcourse we are prettier, beauty comes from within and the outside follows, we know how to be beautiful they are evil inside and out.  look at wasserman.

[Raya @ REAL CONSERVATIVES]

.

.

@ PHILIP SCHNEIDER

GALLERY OF "HANDSOME" WOMEN:

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

Who's prettier?

I refuse to answer on a woman's level of beauty (although the answer is pretty obvious) because it's a no win scenario.

Isn't the old saying true, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"? Women's beauty cannot be measured by some kind of computer software program.

AND . . .  to be absolutely politically correct, Raya will be holding the same and equal "pageant" next week, a REAL CONSERVATIVES PAGEANT for UGLY (MALES)  . . . . `right Raya?

Now that I'm thinking about it, do we need to add a third pageant for ugly (LGBT)?

`

In regards to the question of whether or not women should be in combat consider this, how many MORE male soldiers would be committing suicide had they been witness to females getting blown apart during combat or been taken prisoner only to be raped, tortured, then beheaded?
What would We the People do after watching the arrival of caskets bearing our dead women soldiers returning from combat?
Can you even begin to comprehend the howl from the anti-war crowd? There would be a built-in resistance to go to war.
The unintended consequences of women in combat are too huge to calculate.

Empirical knowledge gained from thousands of years of the world at war trumps today's need to be politically correct by putting women in combat.
I vote NO.