THE NEW PREAMBLE

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

NEW PREAMBLE TO THE NEW NEW PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION

The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. This guy should run for President one day...

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy..

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes ...

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care.. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others.. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were con fused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly....)

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!

---

Thanks to Debbie C., for sharing the above post content.

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

Constantine,
We are in a constant state of agitation here in our beloved country. I believe there are thousands of us who would stand up and proclaim the need for a bill such as you suggest. But your point is well made, is there a lawmaker willing to propose a bill that would put themselves in jeopardy? In other words be a willing one term lawmaker?

[Constantine Ivanov]

To Gordon Ray Kissinger, Philip Schneider, and Wayne Mercier:
Yes, the Bill of Non-Rights is great per se.
My question was:
Do we have a person among lawmakers who has guts to at least propose such a Bill today and stand for it?
A lot of beautiful words around, but...Commies and other thugs in the WH and on the Hill keep committing the same ugly things and dirty tricks as usual.

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

I received this from an online friend nad fellow-patriot. Regardless of whomever actually authored it, the sntiment still rings true.

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

We conservatives hold these "Truths" . . . . . to be self evident.

[Constantine Ivanov]

Sorry for typos. Should be "Rep. Mitchell Kaye didn't deny that."

[Constantine Ivanov]

The Bill of Non-Rights was actualoly written by Lewis Napper, a self-described "amateur philosopher," a Libertarian, in 1993: http://www.lrudel.com/bill.htm; http://www.fightthebias.com/Resources/Humor/bill_of_no_rights.htm.
Very nice, anyway.
Rep. Miktchell Kaye doesn't denie that.
Do we have a person among lawmakers brave enough to at least propose such a Bill?

[Lynn O]

ABSOLUTELY FABULOUS - I loved it! Way to go!