Obama . . . . . . . citizen or not? Supreme Court approaches the issue again.

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open? The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments
should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging
whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president
because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article
II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Unlike other
eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs.
Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of
the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a
person born in the United States to parents who were both American
citizens. "This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney
bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've
shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the
Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ
of certiorari."

This interloper pretending to be our president, has a lot of questions to answer. Will he? Can we make him? Will the court decide to hear the case?

[Sandra]

No Phillip, There are way to many including the Supreme's that know the fraud....