muslim jihadist hacking murder in London have two conservative talking heads discussing "assimilated" muslims.

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

Bill O'Reilley and Laura Ingaham both agree that although the UK has allowed open borders to muslims, the muslims have not "assimilated" like they have here in the America!

`

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3nYAw-H...

`

*  *  *  *  ARE THEY NUTS  !  !  ! *  *  *  *

`

Did they learn nothing from 9-11?

Were they paying attention to the YEARS it took for the best of the worlds police and armies and spy networks to FIND one of the muslim leaders responsible for 9-11. Do they realize muslims in America and world wide protected the 9-11 mastermind so he could not be found? Did O'Reilley or Ingraham report seeing the muslim community jump up and cheer when Bin Laden was killed? Muslims have no love of Christians or Jews. They desire to conquer the entire world, America first.

And O'Reilley and Ingraham think muslims are different here in America. They have to get their heads out of the sand! Like thousands of others they must realize muslim radical jihadists are here. They are here in America, living amongst us, plotting to kill us, planning a caliphate. They live in their own communities separate from us. They have taken control of entire cities like Dearborn Michigan, Cedar Rapids Iowa, and Peoria Illinois. Do they think that the other "peaceful muslims" won't join the jihadists when the balance of power changes to Islam? Even Obama has told us he will join them, "In “Audacity of Hope” he writes: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” The quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of “The Audacity of Hope."

CAN MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS?????

This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. And send it on to everyone. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.

 

 

Can a good Muslim be a good American?

This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god of Arabia . 

Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam. (Quran,2:256)(Koran) 

Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (Quran 4:34)

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' The Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran's 99 excellent names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation... Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and 'good' Americans. Call it what you wish it's still the truth.  The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.

The religious war is bigger than we know or understand!

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. Looks like it may have already started.  

`

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

Lets Roll . . . . .


'IN GOD WE TRUST'

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

DHS guidelines even worse than previously thought

The Daily Caller story below (highlights added) underscores what we’ve been saying for nearly four years about the Obama administration’s denial of jihad as a motivation for terrorism.

According to the story, 2011 Department of Homeland Security guidelines not only discourage investigating leads related to jihad, but federal agents are even discouraged from reaching out to “Muslim reformers”!!!!

“Don’t use trainers … who are self-professed ‘Muslim reformers’ … [or who] equate radical thought [or] religious expressions … with criminal activity,” say the training guidelines.

And just when you think it couldn’t possibly get any worse, it does:

The training guidelines go so far as to urge federal officials to rely on a political report by the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPAC), a Los Angeles, California-based Islamic advocacy group with extensive ties to jihadists and Islamist groups, including the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood.

To summarize, Department of Homeland “Security” guidelines mean:

A jihadist can’t be investigated just because he’s a jihadist; Reformist Muslims like Zuhdi Jasser and Tawfik Hamid, who understand the ideology of radical Islam and sharia law, are not to be used to educate federal officials; “Go-to” sources of information for federal agents include materials provided by Muslim Brotherhood-connected organizations and leaders.

In short, the Muslim Brotherhood has effectively seized control of Department of Homeland Security guidelines for investigating terrorism.

There’s still time to register to attend the national security event of the year in Washington, DC. Click on the image below for more details, how to register, and how to reserve your hotel room at our discounted group rate.

Jihad experts decry White House terror training guidelines

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/jihad-experts-decry-white-house-t...


2:19 AM 05/20/2013

Neil Munro
White House Correspondent



Experts on Islam and terrorism are decrying the Department of Homeland Security’s recently revealed anti-terrorism training guidelines, which pressure cops to ignore Islamic beliefs when investigating terror crimes.

The Boston bombings demonstrated the impact of such training, Andrew McCarthy, a former New York prosecutor, told The Daily Caller.

“The Boston Marathon was bombed by a jihadist who had been investigated by the FBI … [and was confirmed in 2011 to be] an Islamist, which would have been hard not to do since he does not appear to have made any secret of it,” said McCarthy, who persuaded a New York jury in 1995 to convict “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel-Rahman for his use of Islamic teaching to spur jihad attacks, including the 1993 attack against the Twin Towers.

But before the bombing, “the FBI closed its file [on Tamerlan Tsarnaev] because it found this did not constitute ‘derogatory information,’” McCarthy said.

McCarthy and other security experts, and even members of the American Islamic community, indicate that a culture of excessive concern for the sensibilities of Muslims supremacists is preventing law enforcement agencies from pursuing jihadists.

The 2011 guidelines unveiled Thursday by The Daily Caller are part of this pattern of deferring to Islamist chauvinism. (Related: Homeland Security guidelines advise deference to pro-Shariah Muslim...)

Under the federal guidelines, “agents are admonished to discount the possibility that an Islamist’s constitutionally protected abhorrence of the United States might possibly lead to violence,” McCarthy told TheDC.

Even if FBI officials had learned about Tsarnaev’s 2012 trip to a part of southern Russia that is embroiled in a jihadi war, they would not have restarted their 2011 investigation, a government official told the Washington Post in April.

“The FBI investigation into the individual in question had been closed six months prior to his departure from the United States and more than a year before his return. …Since there was no derogatory information, there was no reason to suggest that additional action was warranted,” the official said in April.

On his six-month trip, starting in January 2012, Tsarnaev visited several militant Islamic leaders and mosques in Dagestan, where jihadis are fighting the Russian government, according to several U.S. and Russian media sources.

“The fiasco regarding Boston is a prime example” of how bad training degrades security, said Robert Spencer, an authority on Islamic doctrine who is heavily criticized by Islamic groups in the United States. He noted that even though FBI agents had interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the FBI was unable to identify Tsarnaev in crowd photographs taken before and after the bomb strike.

After the attack, FBI officials also did not ask the main mosque in Boston for help in identifying the suspects, said Nichole Mossalam, a spokeswoman for the Islamic Society of Boston.

“We were the ones who reached out to them … on Friday” once the picture were released, Mossalam told TheDC.

Because of the guidelines, it would be “a ‘profiling’ scandal to show the pictures at the mosque just because it was a bombing with … no other evidence of connection to Muslims,” he said.

The guidelines, titled “Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Training Do’s and Don’ts,” don’t merely promote respect for free expression but actively promote extremist views by telling officials to sideline experts who “venture too deep into the weeds of [Islamic] religious doctrines and history. … [T]hese topics are not necessary in order to understand the [Muslim] community.”

The DHS also actively discourages engagement with moderate Muslims. “Don’t use trainers … who are self-professed ‘Muslim reformers’ … [or who] equate radical thought [or] religious expressions … with criminal activity,” say the training guidelines.

The guidelines also advise cops, “Don’t use a trainer or training that has received repeated external negative feedback … don’t use training that treats the American Muslim community as a problem rather than as a partner … don’t use training that relies on fear [for example, by citing convictions that show] mainstream Muslim organizations have terrorist ties.”

The training guidelines go so far as to urge federal officials to rely on a political report by the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPAC), a Los Angeles, California-based Islamic advocacy group with extensive ties to jihadists and Islamist groups, including the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood.

[CONTINUE READING THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org