How bad was Obama's verbal attack on Israeli JEWS over the 1967 Israeli borders???

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

It was so bad, it even angered some Jewish democrat congressmen . . . .  I said some.

Senate Democrats May Join Rebuff of Obama on Israeli Border Issue

Senate Democrats are expected to support a resolution intended as a rebuff to President Obama’s call for basing Middle East peace talks on the 1967 Israeli-Palestinian borders.

It would be a rare rebuke of the president by the upper chamber and a sign that Democrats are worried about the impact of last week’s speech on the U.S.-Israel relationship and pro-Israel constituents.

Democrats in both chambers are scrambling to fix the damage caused when Obama called for the 1967 borders and land swaps as a basis for peace.

Some Democrats have tried to downplay the rift, but Israel’s strongest supporters in Congress say there’s no denying that Obama made a tactical mistake in handling the relationship.

“I wish that the president had not made the speech on Thursday, particularly not made it — I gather — without much consultation” with Israel, said Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.), an Independent who caucuses with Democrats. “So I think it was a tactical mistake.”

*

“So I think it was a tactical mistake.”

 

Senator Joe Lieberman thinks saving the lives of Israeli's is only a tactical concern for Obama. Saving Jerusalem and all it's Christian religious historical places is only a tactical consideration. Saving America's ONLY ally in the middle east is only a tactical maneuver. 

This dinosaur democrat has got to go. We don't need his sometime conservative vote to honor our war dead and those future war dead in Israel.