CITIZEN PALIN

[Your Uncle Sam]

CITIZEN PALIN

TEA PARTY ADDRESS

06

FEBRUARY 2010


PART ONE


PART TWO


PART THREE


PART FOUR


PART FIVE


PART SIX


PART SEVEN

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

Sarah has found positive conservative and patriotic activity in Texas contributed by Governor Perry.
Debra Medina is a new face.
Somehow the "feministing.com" website doesn't seem mainstream.

[Shirliann]

I don't understand how Palin can be campaining for Rick Perry for Governor of Texas when he has shown that he is not really for "we the People". Forced Vaccines is against our constitution and the NAFTA highway is a part of the "North American Union" and a huge land grab given it to foreign corporations.

Somethings does not seem right here. Palin should be campaigning for Debra Madina, I would think, if she wants to help us get our country back and get rid of the corruption in govenment.

Republican Governor Rick Perry issued an order requiring girls entering the sixth grade to be vaccinated against HPV, the virus that causes cervical cancer.
http://feministing.com/archives/006472.html

The Trans-Texas Corridor, part of the NAFTA Superhighway projected to link the United States with Canada and Mexico as an integral cog of the North American Union, is back on the agenda after Texas Governor Rick Perry lied in claiming that the proposal was dead earlier this year.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14229

Perry’s push for NAFTA super highway
http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/perrys-push-for-nafta...

Texas Governor Perry took Merck money before mandating cervical vaccine
http://www.rawstory.com//news/2007/TX_Gov._Perry_took_Merck_money_0...

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

It sure felt good hearing Sarah validating EVERYTHING we've been reporting right here on this very site.
It was interesting to note that her speech AND the Q and A period were covered by not only FOX but also CNN and MSNBC.
Ed Schultz of MSNBC almost choked having to do post speech commentary with his panel of political experts ALL of whom have made disparaging commentary in the past about Sarah Palin. None of that panel got it right, they all tried to make analysis using the 'Harvard' taught political gamesmanship rule. It didn't fit and Ed Schultz and his panel of experts sounded like some elitist group from Norway or some such far away place with little knowledge of common patriotic folk from grass roots America.
Sarah made a special note of the TEA PARTY movement and it's current state of diffusion, no one leader, just full participation from all participants. THAT is an interesting phenomenon to me. That is what we do here with our discussion process. Where will that lead? Is it a new paradigm which will become a new political process? These are important times. These are interesting times. These are qualities found in no other form of government. These are our freedoms at work, here liberty rules.