REAL CONSERVATIVES

NEVER TOLERATE TYRANNY!....Conservative voices from the GRASSROOTS.

They have our judicial system corrupted in deception, to protect the one...

This post is about the orchestrated obstruction. It's about the corruption.
Judicial interference and scandalous nepotism/cronyism that continues to be
blatant in our nation.
I'll post any inaccuracies about this.
They counted on our being stupid. They didn't think we would take the time to look into it.
The ridiculing of people asking legitimate questions is an orchestrated attack, perpetrated
by people who have no documented proof either. Because they choose to believe a flimsy
attempt at a bluff, they feel they can shut up those who want more concrete proof.
Don't let them intimidate or suppress your asking.
Berg's Lawsuit Never had a Chance
Thanks JoAnneMor

While looking around through documents I came upon some surprising information.

The Judge who dismissed the legitimacy suit brought forth by Phil J Berg is a former associate from Holder's law firm, Covington & Burling.

Judge Richard W Roberts was also appointed by none other than Eric Holder.

Now I'm not sure how you feel about this legitimacy case, but I'm sure we can all agree on the fact that Obama's records are sealed.

Until those documents are released, all questions are valid.

That's not what this post is about.

This post is about the orchestrated obstruction. It's about the corruption. Judicial interference and scandalous nepotism/cronyism that is blatant in this story.

Here are more facts.

The Judge that dismissed the case against Phil Berg is also an associate in the law firm Covington & Burling.

That judge was appointed by Eric Holder.

Eric Holder is also with Covington & Burling.

Holder is a Partner in the firm.

Have a look at this info and links.

There is more to this story, but talk about stacking the deck!...C'mon now!

RICHARD W. ROBERTS NAMED CRIMINAL SECTION CHIEF IN
CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Richard W. Roberts, Principal Assistant
U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C., has been named Chief of the
Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division, the Justice
Department announced today.
Roberts succeeds Linda Davis who was nominated by President
Clinton as a D.C. Superior Court judge.
Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Deval L. Patrick
said Roberts will lead the Department's efforts to enforce the
nation's criminal civil rights laws.
"Mr. Roberts' wealth of experience in criminal civil rights
laws and his management experience will make him an extremely
valuable asset to the Division," stated Patrick.
Roberts, 41, a native of New York City, has served in the U.S.
Attorney's office in Washington since December 1988. During that
time he served in the Trial/Grand Jury Section, the Public
Corruption Section, and the Economic Crimes Section. In October
1993, Roberts was appointed by U.S. Attorney Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as
the Principal Assistant U.S. Attorney, serving as second-in-command
of the office.
Prior to joining the U.S. Attorney's office, Roberts served
for three years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Manhattan. He was
an associate with the Washington law firm of Covington and Burling
for three years, and also served for four years as a trial attorney
in the Section he will now head.

WASHINGTON, DC, February 3, 2009 — Eric H. Holder, Jr. was sworn in today as the Attorney General of the United States, having been confirmed yesterday by the Senate. This morning’s swearing-in ceremony took place at the Justice Department, and the oath was administered by Vice President Biden.

Mr. Holder, who was a partner at Covington & Burling LLP for the past eight years, previously served as Deputy Attorney General, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, and a Judge of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia.

http://www.cov.com/news/detail.aspx?news=1391

This is the dismissal order. I couldn't get it to copy & paste, so I'll link you to it.

Check out who signed it. None other than the same Judge Richard W, Roberts.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20025741/BERG-v-OBAMA-22-qui-tam-sealed-c...

If this isn't a conflict of interest and a serious ethical problem, What is.

Ps. The same judge is now doing the same thing to Walpin.

Walpin has no chance either.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/16/walpin-gate-gets-rusty/

One last side note.

Eric Holder is not only prosecuting the Gitmo Detainees, he's also representing them via Covington & Burling. Have a look at this too.

Quite a web: http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/23/pay-attention-to-eric-holders-...

UPDATE ON ATTORNEY PHILIP J. BERG’S ACTIVE CASES AS OF FEBRUARY 17, 2010

Below is an update on Philip J. Berg’s Active Cases:

Berg as Relator v. Obama

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Ca No. 08-cv-1933

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Case No. 09-5362

Berg as Relator v. Obama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Filings can be reviewed at: Berg as Relator v. Obama (Sealed Case)

Hollister v. Soetoro, et al

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 08-cv-02254

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Case No. 09-5080 consolidated with 09-5161

This Case is currently in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Appellant’s Opening brief is due November 20, 2009.

November 24, 2009, Lawrence J. Joyce, Esquire on behalf of himself as Amicus and Counsel for Amicus Philip J. Berg, Esquire filed a Motion today seeking Leave of Court to file a Brief Amicus Curiae. What this means is Mr. Joyce and Mr. Berg are seeking the Court’s permission to file their Brief Amicus Curiae in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In addition, Mr. Joyce and Mr. Berg also filed their Brief Amicus Curiae.

What is a Brief Amicus Curiae? Amicus Curiae is a legal Latin phrase, which means “friend of the court”, that refers to someone, not a party to a case, who volunteers to offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it. The information may be a legal opinion in the form of a Brief, a testimony that has not been solicited by any of the parties, or a learned treatise on a matter that bears on the case.

In other words, a Brief Amicus Curiae is a legal argument filed in a lawsuit by a person or organization not a party to the case, but who has an interest in the outcome.

Copies of these documents are located below under the case header Hollister v. Soetoro, et al.


Thank to Donna Crowell for sharing the above post content.

Views: 35

Comment

You need to be a member of REAL CONSERVATIVES to add comments!

Join REAL CONSERVATIVES

Comment by Gordon Ray Kissinger on February 28, 2010 at 10:48am
Sky News - Hawaii reports Obama's birth certificate lost in fire? The voices of protest are getting LOUDER
http://news.sky.com:80/skynews/Home/World-News/Obama-Birther-Row-Re...

More-
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com:80/2010/02/sky-news-haw...
Comment by Gordon Ray Kissinger on February 27, 2010 at 5:27pm

BOOK STORE

.

opencomments316

SUPPORT

REAL CONSERVATIVES 

Order our book!

$ 9.95

INSTANT DOWNLOAD

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://www.lulu.com/shop/raymond-athens/right-side-up/ebook/product-17358205.html

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://www.lulu.com/shop/raymond-athens/right-side-up/ebook/product-17358205.html

 

The book RIGHT SIDE UP is a compilation of choice content from this web site...reflecting sometimes forgotten, purely Traditional American Values...

*********************

The Unborn

...let them BE !

Image result for BABY BLUE EYES

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://tpartyus2010.ning.com/forum/topics/save-a-life-and-maybe-a-soul

 

*****************

.

.

RICHARD

ALLAN

JENNI'S

THE

DANNY MALONE TRILOGY

CLICK HERE:

http://www.amazon.com/Danny-Malone-Trilogy-Mohammeds-Daughter/dp/1432724932

"The Fox, Golden Gate and Mohammed's Daughter"

Paperback

*************************

© 2022   Created by Your Uncle Sam.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service