NEVER TOLERATE TYRANNY!....Conservative voices from the GRASSROOTS.

ABORTION "PAID FOR" IN SENATE BILL WITH ACCOUNTING TRICK

INFORMATIONAL
============
Thank you for clearing that up, Secretary Sebelius! Here is video of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius explaining that the Senate Health Care Bill really does contain an "accounting measure" that takes funds from everyone to provide abortion coverage. Sebelius did everything she could not to use the word "abortion," but the interviewer was lost with Sebelius' convoluted explanation, so she finally used it at the end. Essentially, Sebelius was trying to assure pro-abortion activists that the bill actually covers abortions even though they tried to make it look like it does not.

Nothing like transparency, EH?

Rating:

Currently 5/5 stars.
1
2
3
4
5

Get Embed Code

Tags:

You need to be a member of REAL CONSERVATIVES to add comments!

Join REAL CONSERVATIVES

Comment by Gordon Ray Kissinger on December 23, 2009 at 9:46am: Boehner: Senate Health Plan Subsidizes Abortions
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:51 AM
By: Dan Weil

House Republican Leader John Boehner, Ohio, says Senate Democrats’ healthcare bill doesn’t keep federal money from financing abortions, as they claim.

“Fixed it is not,” Boehner writes on his web site.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s, D-Nev., latest healthcare ‘manager’s amendment’ would still levy a new ‘abortion premium’ fee on Americans under the Democrats’ healthcare plan.”

The amendment doesn’t prohibit abortion coverage for federally subsidized plans participating in the insurance exchange, Boehner says.

“Instead, the amendment includes layers of accounting gimmicks that demand that plans participating in the exchange or the new government-run plan … must establish ‘allocation accounts’ when elective abortion is a covered benefit,” Boehner writes.

“Everyone enrolled in these plans must pay a monthly abortion premium, and these funds will be used to pay for the elective abortion services.”

To be sure, the bill does allow states to opt out of the requirement is they pass laws to prohibit insurance coverage of abortion, Boehner writes.

“But it’s a sham because it does nothing to prevent one state’s tax dollars from paying for elective abortions in other states.”

Boehner isn’t the only abortion opponent upset with the Senate bill.

National Right to Life Committee legislative director Douglas Johnson said in a statement, “The new abortion language solves none of the fundamental abortion-related problems with the Senate bill, and it actually creates some new abortion-related problems.”

But abortion opponents can take heart. Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., and about 40 other Democrats in the House made their support for healthcare reform contingent on a strong anti-abortion provision.

So a bill without such a provision is unlikely to gain final approval in the House, let alone the Senate.

http://tiny.cc/M5rKC

Comment by Gordon Ray Kissinger on December 23, 2009 at 9:27am: I will definitely go to jail before I'm in any way a part to supporting this!

Comment by Kathryn Ball on December 22, 2009 at 8:12pm: For all of those who defend a woman's "RIGHT to CHOOSE"................What if YOUR mothers had opted to terminate the pregnancy that produced YOU ?????????

Would this be a better.......more "friendly to life" world?????????????????

What made 'YOU' more special than the 'mass of tissue' of the same gestation, carried in a different uterus????

The 'transparency' is actually evident to those of us who are paying attention..............may God have mercy on your souls........perhaps He can forgive you but I can not..........!