...the Truth in BOLD

[Raya @ REAL CONSERVATIVES]

.

Recently, the Washington Post lied about Trump. That is not newsworthy, because lying is the norm for yellow dog journalists. It is not news when a dog bites a man. Only when the man bites the dog is it deemed newsworthy, and marketable. They hide (cower) behind the First Amendment rights of a Free Press, claiming a sort of mystical license bestowed upon them by the Supreme Law of the land, the Constitution. They brandish the Bill of Rights and their Press Credentials in much the same way as members of a S.W.A.T. team do when, with guns drawn, brandish their badges during a raid. But there is a profound difference between a corrupt press in a feeding frenzy to tarnish Honorable Men for the sake of a corrupt political agenda, motivated by hatred, and Honorable Men in the blue uniform who risk their very lives in the never-ending struggle against crime. One group fights evil, the other IS evil. It is up to you, the reader, who must discern the difference.

It is comfortable to imagine that the Press, like the Police, is righteous and just, with only the Truth as their shining beacon. Nothing is further from the truth. The contemporary Press is not the Idyllic Free Press of old. It is not as we imagine it.

Following is a recent example of how the cowardly purveyors of "Fake News" distort reality to advance their own dogmatic false narratives (lies) through a cunning employment of insidious techniques that are more akin to Agitprop than Journalism. They unleash the fowl, putrid, slanderous slime (which they fancy as "Journalism") from their pens that are dipped in the sewer water they call printers' ink. That slimy invective they call Truth is only a concoction of falsehoods, that is specifically targeted at the "snowflake" liberals who comprise the majority of their audience, designed to attract the low-life segment of our society, much like the common fly is attracted to the filth of that sewer dung upon which they thrive.

Since therefore, seeking to create a firewall against libel or slander lawsuits, they bury or embed the nugget of truth which must appear obscurely in each of their slanderous articles wouldn't it be fair to require that they print that truth in bold-face, so that it can be easily discerned from the crap by the average reader?...much like this? See what I mean? Wouldn't this simple requirement save the millions of consumers billions of hours trying to find Truth amidst such rampant falsehood? Is there anyone who would object to the simple requirement that although they can say anything they want according to the first amendment, they must distinguish the factual truth from the lies with BOLD-FACE TYPE? Is there anyone who would credibly argue that this requirement infringed upon their precious and coveted Press Freedom (which has devolved into mere poetic license)?

What does "bold faced lie" mean?

In the interest of further edifying you, the reader, I remind you of the origins of the phrase "Bold Faced Lie" I propose that we observe TRUTH in Bold-Face, rather than lies. From the latter part of the seventeenth century onward, it took on a sense of something or someone who was audacious, shameless or impudent, so that a barefaced lie was one in which the speaker made no attempt to disguise it as truth. An animal that is bald-faced has a white face or a white mark on the head.

The story in question begins by insinuating that an Honorable Man, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has committed treason. After a long, libelous, slanderous narration that is fraught with outright lies, distortions, half-truths, innuendo and omissions, and only in the interest of presuming a tenuous immunity, they pre-emptorily assert the twisted caveat of a self-defensive disclaimer, (which is always innocuously, obscurely buried in the body of the otherwise libelous text)

TO WIT; .

EXTRACTED FROM THE WAPO ARTICLE:

National Security

Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show

By Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller July 21 at 7:31 PM

Russia’s ambassador to Washington told his superiors in Moscow that he discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Jeff Sessions during the 2016 presidential race, contrary to public assertions by the embattled attorney general, according to current and former U.S. officials.

Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s accounts of two conversations with Sessions — then a top foreign policy adviser to Republican candidate Donald Trump — were intercepted by U.S. spy agencies, which monitor the communications of senior Russian officials in the United States and in Russia. Sessions initially failed to disclose his contacts with Kislyak and then said that the meetings were not about the Trump campaign.

One U.S. official said that Sessions — who testified that he had no recollection of an April encounter — has provided “misleading” statements that are “contradicted by other evidence.” A former official said that the intelligence indicates that Sessions and Kislyak had “substantive” discussions on matters including Trump’s positions on Russia-related issues and prospects for U.S.-Russia relations in a Trump administration.

Sessions has said repeatedly that he never discussed campaign-related issues with Russian officials and that it was only in his capacity as a U.S. senator that he met with Kislyak

{ This shamefully long, largely libelous and untruthful boring article can be read in its entirety by clicking here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-dis...

The article can be summed up in three words:  BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, but in the interest of full disclosure, I feel it necessary to re-print the aforementioned weasel worded disclaimer,

IN BOLD-FACED TYPE, here:

"... Officials emphasized that the information contradicting Sessions comes from U.S. intelligence on Kislyak’s communications with the Kremlin, and they acknowledged that the Russian ambassador could have mischaracterized or exaggerated the nature of his interactions."

( There, that is your 'kernel of truth' in this otherwise criminal hit piece )

Signing off...for now

RayA @ REAL CONSERVATIVES

.

.

~~~~~~~

SUPPORT

REAL CONSERVATIVES 

Order our book!

$ 9.95

INSTANT DOWNLOAD

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://www.lulu.com/shop/raymond-athens

/right-side-up/ebook/product-17358205.html

.

.

[Raya @ REAL CONSERVATIVES]

.

.

MAY 20, 2018:

.

.

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

We the People have needed to be self taught to protect ourselves from this travesty of journalistic execution.

Millions of Americans have followed the journalistic piper and are now willing to destroy what was once the only true bastion of Liberty and Freedom to ever appear on the face of this earth.

These are truly dangerous times.