REAL CONSERVATIVES

NEVER TOLERATE TYRANNY!....Conservative voices from the GRASSROOTS.

The Presidential election of 2016 is over, democrats win!

Election fraud in 2012 was rampant. Media did a huge cover-up. Republican candidates have been shamed into NOT challenging the vote outcome. The media do an exit poll on the election eve and it is THEY who tell us who won and have ALL the numbers even down to each PRECINCT with a vote prediction. The polls close. No one is let in to see the tabulations and WALLA a democrat wins.

 The US congress is currently legislating even MORE insurance for a democrat victory in 2016. They are going to make Illegal Aliens their next group of 20 million new democrat votes!

 The Republican Party is more interested right now in keeping the TEA PARTY from coming to power with our conservative votes. They have no prospective presidential candidate in the que. The Republicans have already neutered themselves politically. The current Republican leaders in congress, Boehner and McConnell, are as useless as tits on a bull.

`

Democrats Move to Make Voter Fraud Easier

February 05, 2013 Rush Limbaugh

`

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT


RUSH: This next story, I just marvel.  I literally marvel at the alliance that there is between the Democrat Party and the Drive-By Media.  This is a story in the New York Times.  The headline really says it all, but I'll give you some details.  "Waiting Times at Ballot Boxes Draw Scrutiny -- With studies suggesting that long lines at the polls cost Democrats hundreds of thousands of votes in November, party leaders are beginning a push to make voting and voter registration easier, setting up a likely new conflict with Republicans over a deeply polarizing issue."

So long lines at your polling place, that's just not fair to Democrats.  That is making it harder for Democrats to get votes.  Those long lines cost the Democrats hundreds of thousands of votes.  Why, if there hadn't been long lines, why, the Democrats mighta won this by an additional two percentage points.  Oh, yeah, the long lines, they're all Democrat voters.  There aren't any Republicans in there.  The people really, really desirous to vote, the people that show up and wait in line a long time, obviously they're voting for Democrats.  Nobody would do that to vote for a Republican.  If there were long lines for Republicans to vote, the New York Times would have a story on how we can make the lines longer. 

Now, this article is motivated by three things.  First -- and this is the key -- and, remember, it's the New York Times, so there's always an agenda behind this stuff.  This is not news.  The biggest thing anybody could learn is that stories in the New York Times today are not news.  They are related to the achievement of the next phase of the Obama agenda.  Every story for the most part, particularly domestic political stories, are nothing more than telltale indicators of what it is Obama wants next.  In other words, here we are on February 5th and we get a story in the New York Times about long lines at the polling place.  Why don't we get this story two days after the election?  If long lines at polling places was a problem, why now?  Why February 5th?  There isn't an election any time soon. 

So what is this all about?  Well, you have come to the right place.  This article is motivated by three things.  First, the Supreme Court is about to rule on the Voting Rights Act in a few weeks, so the New York Times is leaning on them.  The New York Times knows that the justices of the Supreme Court value the opinion of reporters and editors at the New York Times.  And so the Times is getting its marker down on what it wants the court to do in relationship to this Voting Rights Act case that's coming up.  And without getting into specifics, what they want the justices to do is find it possible, make it possible for more Democrats to vote, make it easier for more Democrats to vote. 

Notice there's nothing here about Republicans being in these long lines.  The whole premise of the story, long lines equal long waits, equals people leaving the line and going home and not voting, which equals lost votes for the Democrats, which equals, "We can't have that."  And so the Voting Rights Act case, without getting into specifics of it, the New York Times is putting down a marker for the justices so that they can keep in mind what's really important about the Voting Rights Act, and that is to do whatever is necessary in their ruling to make it possible for fraud to continue, to make it possible for registration and voting on the same day, same place, to take place, to happen, or whatever is necessary to facilitate Democrats winning elections. 

originalThe second thing involved in this story, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat, New York, is sponsoring a Senate voting bill at the behest of Obama which will address the problems of access to voting.  Kirsten Gillibrand has determined somehow that many Democrats are finding it more difficult than ever to vote, so she has a piece of legislation to make it easier for them to vote. 

(interruption)

Well, but there is an access problem, otherwise there wouldn't be long lines, don't you see.  Plus, the Republicans keep making noise about photo ID, and we need to settle that once and for all, and we need to settle that in the Voting Rights Act. We need to make sure there is never, ever gonna be anything like a photo ID requirement. Never, ever gonna make sure there's a federal photo ID requirement to vote.  Lastly, this is all part of the Democrats' push to allow more ballot stuffing by extending Election Day for weeks and doing away with the voter ID requirement in general.  And if Congress will not do these things, then Obama will have to bypass Congress and do away with these restrictions by executive order. 

Now, in this story, the New York Times cites a professor who says, quote, "Voting is one of the most sacred rights you have.  They should make it as painless as possible," implying that it's really painful now to vote.  It's really hard.  It's too hard.  The Republicans are out there demanding everybody have a picture.  The Republicans are demanding that everybody who vote actually be a citizen.  The Republicans are demanding that everybody who vote actually be registered.  That's too hard.  And it's undemocratic.  And the justices have gotta sweep all these restrictions away. 

Now, is voting any more of a sacred right than owning a gun?  Because these same people want to make that as painful as possible.  Same people, same people want to make owning a gun as painful as they can make it, and voting as painless as they can make it.  " "With studies suggesting that long lines at the polls cost Democrats hundreds of thousands of votes in November, party leaders are beginning a push to make voting and voter registration easier, setting up a likely new conflict with Republicans."  Now, what does voter registration have to do with long lines to vote?  Voter registration doesn't have anything to do with Election Day.  But it will.  Because if they get their way you're gonna be able to do both on the spot. On the spot registration, you register, then you go vote, same thing, same time.  Yep.  That's the next phase. 

I thought also the last two presidential elections had pretty close to record turnout.  Am I wrong about that?  I am wrong about that?  Well, the last was lower than the first one but relative to other elections is pretty high.  My point is that, are you aware of people not being able to vote who wanted to vote?  I'm not, either.  I didn't hear any stories about that.  That's my whole point.  Why do we get this story now, February 5th?  Long lines hurt the Democrats?  This is all about existing legislation.  Well, proposed legislation by Senator Gillibrand and the Supreme Court decision and same day registration and voting. 

"White House officials have told Congressional leaders that the president plans to press for action on Capitol Hill, and Democrats say they expect him to highlight the issue in his State of the Union address next week. Democrats in the House and Senate have already introduced bills that would require states to provide online voter registration and allow at least 15 days of early voting." So that's why we have this story.


END TRANSCRIPT

`

Click here to find out more!

Views: 46

Comment

You need to be a member of REAL CONSERVATIVES to add comments!

Join REAL CONSERVATIVES

Comment by PHILIP SCHNEIDER on February 8, 2013 at 4:54pm

What he meant was the liberal progressive radical democrat machine is going to BY-PASS Boehner and the rest of the House of Representatives and conduct the House's business without conservatives, TEA PARTY, or Republicans. Think they won't do it??? Take a look around you!

Comment by Gordon Ray Kissinger on February 8, 2013 at 11:42am

Obama says his agenda will put Pelosi back in charge

Neil Munro  1:49 PM 02/07/2013
  

President Barack Obama told House Democrats that his aggressive political agenda can help Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi regain the speakership of the House.

“It won’t be smooth, it won’t be simple, there will be frustrations, there will be times when you guys will be mad at me …. [but] as a byproduct of doing that good work, I would expect that Nancy Pelosi will be speaker again soon,” he said during a lunchtime speech at the Leesburg, Va., summit of the Democrats’ congressmen and congresswomen.

He outlined that agenda in his speech, telling the House members he would push for increased taxes, for curbs on guns and for an rewrite of immigration law.

Those controversies may divide the GOP’s House caucus, and may also spur turnout in 2014 by seniors on Medicare, and by the suburbanites and Hispanics who usually vote at lower rates during off-year elections. During the tenure of President George W. Bush, the GOP’s efforts to highlight political divides that favored the GOP — such as state ballots that defined marriage — were slammed as  “wedge issues” by Democratic activists and establishment media outlets.

The next fiscal battle will be fought over the 2011 sequester deal, which will cut roughly $90 billion from Pentagon and domestic spending by December, beginning in March.

The broad spending cut should be offset by targeted cuts and by tax increases on wealthy Americans, he said.

The GOP wants to cut Medicare and Social Security, education and aid for parents with disabled kids, he said. But the cuts “shouldn’t be on the backs of seniors … [or] young people trying to get a college education, [or] parents who are trying to give their kids a better start in life,” he declared.

He said he wants “to close some tax loopholes and deductions that the average American can’t take advantage of … [and] that is an argument I’m more than willing to engage in.”

“We can win that debate because we’re on the right side of the argument,” he said.

This week, Obama’s White House deputies have been meeting with lobbyists for groups that receive federal funding, such as defense companies, and with lobbyists for groups of retailers, business owners and bankers.

The meetings were called to “discuss the president’s efforts to find a balanced approach to reduce the deficit and avoid the devastating effects of the sequester along,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said Thursday.

The groups also met to talk about the “president’s approach to comprehensive immigration reform and how it fits into our broader economic agenda,” Carney said.

An immigration rewrite is also critical, Obama told his fellow Democrats.

The country has gained from “our history of attracting talent from all around the globe — I’ve seen that talent in some of the young ‘dreamers’ that I’ve met,” he claimed.

“Dreamers” refer to people who were brought into the country as children, and are named after the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors, an conditional amnesty bill that has repeatedly been defeated in Congress.

Obama has already offered work permits to at least 800,000 of the younger illegal immigrants, even though only 20 percent have any post-high-school education.

“Now is the time,” he declared, although he also acknowledged that any rewrite faces tough opposition. “In some places, this may end up being a tough issue,” he said.

Obama said he would also push for new curbs on “the cycle of gun violence,” while warning that issue is also unpopular in some places.

“There are regional differences, and we should respect those,” he said. “Guns mean something different for someone who grew up on a farm … [than for] someone who grew up in a city,” he said.

“We’ve got a lot more work to do… but as long as we keep in mind why we came here in the first place … [and] as a byproduct of doing that good work, I would expect that Nancy Pelosi will be speaker again soon.”

Follow Neil on Twitter -

Comment by PHILIP SCHNEIDER on February 6, 2013 at 8:35pm

The RNC made the agreement and it is binding on them except with a court order.

However, each candidate can pursue a case of vote fraud or impropriety against any precinct but as we've seen, no Republicans have the guts including Romney.

The voter fraud problem may be recognized by Republicans and conservative candidates as being way too huge to make a successful challenge. The democrat machine had hundreds of attorneys in place to battle vote fraud challenges way before the November election took place.

Comment by PHILIP SCHNEIDER on February 6, 2013 at 4:58pm

Ahhhh Raya, you kill me . . . . but not literally.

Comment by Raya @ REAL CONSERVATIVES on February 6, 2013 at 2:27pm

.

.

...say, CHEESE!

.

.

Comment by PHILIP SCHNEIDER on February 6, 2013 at 12:05pm

You've got a photographic memory.

Comment by Raya @ REAL CONSERVATIVES on February 6, 2013 at 11:45am

BOOK STORE

.

opencomments316

SUPPORT

REAL CONSERVATIVES 

Order our book!

$ 9.95

INSTANT DOWNLOAD

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://www.lulu.com/shop/raymond-athens/right-side-up/ebook/product-17358205.html

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://www.lulu.com/shop/raymond-athens/right-side-up/ebook/product-17358205.html

 

The book RIGHT SIDE UP is a compilation of choice content from this web site...reflecting sometimes forgotten, purely Traditional American Values...

*********************

The Unborn

...let them BE !

Image result for BABY BLUE EYES

TO ORDER

CLICK HERE:

http://tpartyus2010.ning.com/forum/topics/save-a-life-and-maybe-a-soul

 

*****************

.

.

RICHARD

ALLAN

JENNI'S

THE

DANNY MALONE TRILOGY

CLICK HERE:

http://www.amazon.com/Danny-Malone-Trilogy-Mohammeds-Daughter/dp/1432724932

"The Fox, Golden Gate and Mohammed's Daughter"

Paperback

*************************

© 2024   Created by Your Uncle Sam.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service