Liberal progressive radical democrats have taken this once great nation to a point where we gun down our own children.

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

AMEN!!

 

After reading this article, a writer from Canada has a better understanding of why the tragedy at Newtown, Connecticut happened than many Americans!

 

Analysis from Canada on the Conn. School Shootings

Editorial

Blood is on The Hands of the LEFT

By: Howard Galganov, Canadian writer December 14, 2012

 

I was just about to publish my latest editorial... On Canada’s Supreme Court decision to suspend Freedom of Speech in favor of promoting one language over all others. THEN THE CONNECTICUT SCHOOL SHOOTINGS HAPPENED.

What happened at Sandy Hook School takes precedence over any language issues in Canada and a failed Judicial System in both our countries.

 

I won't waste words describing my feelings, because how I feel is indescribable about 27 people murdered, (20 young children and six adults at the school),the murder of the shooter's mother beforehand, then the cowardly suicide of the shooter at the school as law enforcement closed in. 

BUT I CAN TELL YOU WITH CERTAINTY WHY IT HAPPENED:

It didn’t happen because of the so-called gun culture, or because of poor security at the school. It happened because of the modern LEFTIST culture that has been busy removing all semblance of personal responsibility and respect from our lives.

It happened because of the Hollywood and television types who lecture the Conservatives on how people should live, while they make FORTUNES producing absolute FILTH and VIOLENCE in their movies, videos and television programs.

It happened because of reality TV shows that demean humanity, along with shows that make people laugh at the pain and humiliation of others. 

The senseless murders happened because multi-millionaire computer game producers create UGLY digital scenarios that poison young minds with abject depravity and gratuitous violence.

It happened because the school system doesn’t teach values, and promotes the idea that 'anything goes.' And that all people are equal, regardless of the truth. And that no one ever fails. 

It happened because LEFTISTS won’t allow concerned and loving parents to discipline their children, or raise their children in the time-honored way they feel is right. 

It happened because far too many Liberals spend their time and effort ridiculing and attacking the people who want to live by the lessons of the Bible and the Torah.

In truth, this and other horrible acts of violence happen because our society-- from the entertainment industry to schools to the media and to our governments-- have created the social and cultural foundation that is eating away at both Canada and the United States like a cancer.

I know that what I am writing will inflame those on the LEFT, but that’s OK-- because if they don't like it, they can ROT in HELL along with the demons and losers of their own creation. I want my old country's values back.

Values like standing in school when an adult entered the room. Like being seriously disciplined for bad behavior. Like when we were measured by our successes and failures. When not everyone had to waste years of his or her life going to college to study basket weaving instead of taking a trades course or going to work or the service right after high school. When your Mom was a caring woman and your Dad was a real man, an authority in the home. And when there weren't vulgar parades extolling the “virtues” of being gay.

 

If you want to stop the sickness . . . IT’S TIME TO STOP THE LEFT.

In sadness . . . Howard Galganov

`

`

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

Patton: Here Come The Drones

By Doug Patton February 7, 2013 6:55 am

Are you government-approved in every area of your life? As radio host Mark Levin recently pointed out, we all operate within the strangling decrees of oppressive federal regulations: government-approved light bulbs, government-approved washers and dryers, government-approved refrigerators, government-approved automobiles, etc. The list goes on and on. We can't even go to the bathroom in our own homes without having to flush a government-mandated commode — twice — which, of course, defeats the whole purpose of a "low-flow" toilet. And coming soon to the domicile of the future: smart thermostats that will monitor the temperature in your home and automatically regulate it if you are using too much energy.

Now Big Brother has decided he has the right to scrutinize your life through the use of his latest toy, the drone, the high-tech equivalent of Winston Smith's telescreen, which monitored his every move in George Orwell's chilling 1949 novel, "Nineteen Eighty-Four."

Because of the increased use of drones — military and civilian — lawmakers in California, Florida, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas and Virginia now are in the process of banning the use of such technology in their skies.

"Our Founders had no conception of things that would fly over them at night and peer into backyards and send signals back to a home base," said State Senator Donald McEachin, a Virginia Democrat and co-sponsor of a bill that would forbid the use of drones in most instances.

In libertarian-minded Montana, legislators from both parties are working on proposals to restrict the use of drones.

"I do not think our citizens would want cameras to fly overhead and collect data on our lives," Republican State Senator Matthew Rosendale told a legislative committee recently.

"It's important for us to prevent Missouri from sliding into a police-type state," says State Rep. Casey Guernsey, a Republican in the show-me state.

Groups as diverse as the Tea Party and the American Civil Liberties Union are supportive of these actions by state governments. However, according to the ACLU, states will not be able to stop federal agencies from using drones.

"The use of drones across the country has become a great threat to our personal privacy," says ACLU of Montana policy director Niki Zupanic. "The door is wide open for intrusions into our personal private space."

In the age of second-term Obama, such concerns may take a back seat to a much more sinister agenda. Recently, a confidential Justice Department document has come to light. It advises the Obama administration that the use of drones in foreign countries to kill Americans suspected of having ties to terrorists is perfectly legal!

"The U.S citizenship of a leader of al-Qaida or its associated forces does not give that person constitutional immunity from attack," the report reads. "The Due Process Clause (of the U.S. Constitution) does not prohibit a lethal operation of the sort contemplated here."

If those words do not send shivers up your backside, then you yourself are a drone. The criteria for using such a strike to kill an American citizen is said to be as follows: the person must be a suspected al-Qaida leader; an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government must have determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States; capture of the individual must be infeasible; and finally, the operation must be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable principles governing the laws of war.

Conspicuously absent from the DOJ report is any discussion of whether drone strikes on U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism may be conducted on American soil. And therein lies the problem. Remember when Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano stated that her department considered pro-life demonstrators and Tea Party activists to be dangerous potential terrorists? Even disgruntled returning war vets were on her paranoid list.

The last time I checked, she was considered a "high-level official of the U.S. government.

It is a short jump from attacking "suspected enemies" abroad to attacking them here. From there, it is another abbreviated leap from attacking Americans suspected of al-Qaida ties to Americans considered terrorists of another stripe.

Elections have consequences. Here come the drones.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2013/02/07/patton-here-come-the-dr...

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

Mounting Questions on How Obama Chooses Whom to Kill, as Brennan Hearing Opens

7 February 2013

So, let’s get this straight: Two years ago President Obama ordered the assassination-by-drone of an American citizen overseas. The fellow was successfully vaporized.

And according to Wednesday afternoon’s headlines, Obama just now “agrees” to share with Congress the memos he relied on for his legal justification to kill that American. And by extension, others that Obama or his successors might deem expendable for “national security” reasons.

This from the arugula-loving Democrat who professed such profound moral outrage over the non-lethal (Republican) terrorist interrogation process called waterboarding. The brief senator who said such “extreme” measures, producing priceless intelligence saving countless lives, violated American morality and war conduct, albeit without killing. And that waterboarding undermined the rule of law.

But whacking an American terrorism suspect on foreign soil with no hearing or evidence beyond geographical proximity to other suspected terrorists is fine? And for two whole years was unworthy of explanation to the equal branch of elected government that declares war? Seriously?

Wasn’t this what the Soviets were doing to perceived domestic security threats abroad for so many years? But it’s OK now because the intelligence agency doing the killing is our CIA instead of their KGB?

Is there a civil liberties attorney in the house?

We’re going to hear a whole lot more about this issue today and beyond. That’s because John Brennan is a key architect of Obama’s “There-he-is, let-him-have-it” drone assassination strategy. And Brennan begins his Senate confirmation hearings today to become director of said CIA.

Read More: http://news.investors.com/

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

Napolitano: Obama 'stealing' American lives

Judge blasts White House orders to assassinate U.S. citizens

http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/napolitano-obama-stealing-american-lives...

President Obama’s policy of targeting enemies, including Americans, for death through drone strikes is the latest and most alarming example of the endless expansion of government power, according to Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Napolitano is the senior judicial analyst for the Fox News Channel and is the author most recently of “Theodore and Woodrow” and “The Freedom Answer Book.” He says the growth in government power is nothing new, and the erosion of individual freedoms is always pitched in pleasant ways.

“Monster government almost always comes with a smiling face,” he said. “After it’s here, the face loses its smile and it saps our liberties and our prosperity.”

Read Andrew Napolitano’s hot new column, “Obama gives himself permission to kill,” in which he asks: When will president’s drone murders come home to our shores?

Napolitano said there is no implosion of rights as troubling as what we’re seeing this week as the Obama administration defends the targeting and killing of enemies, including American citizens, without giving them the right to due process.

“I’ve often commented that my job here at Fox is to monitor the government as it steals your liberty and steals your property, but I never thought I’d be monitoring the government stealing your life,” he said. “Essentially, that’s what this is.”

The administration’s legal justification for the drone program was laid out in a Department of Justice “white paper” that made its way to NBC News on Sunday night. The paper, which is a distillation of countless other reports, clearly lays out what the Obama administration considers justification for the program of targeted kills.

“It basically says that the president of the United States can authorize an ‘informed, high-level official of the U.S. government’ to strip the constitutional protections of an American in a foreign country if the informed official is satisfied that the American is an imminent danger to American national security and his capture or arrest would be impractical,” Napolitano said. “That is basically the power claimed by kings and tyrants. I can suspend the law to get you if you are a danger.”

There are defenders of the Obama drone policy on both sides of the aisle, but Napolitano said their arguments fly in the face of the principles on which America was founded.

“Would we live in a safer society if the government could cut down every law and abrogate every freedom and break down every door and arrest everybody it wanted?,” asked Napolitano. “We’d be safe from the bad guys, but we wouldn’t be safe from the government. Who would want to live in such a society?”

The judge said it’s very easy to read the administration’s legal defense for the drone program and see how it could be used to target any American.

“The language in this 16-page document could easily apply to Americans in America,” said Napolitano. “So the president could decide that Bill O’Reilly or Glenn Beck or Judge Napolitano are just too troublesome, too meddlesome, too much of an obstacle to the accomplishment of his purposes, and it’s time to take them out.

“The core of the argument is ‘trust us.’  That’s an argument that the Supreme Court rejected because it doesn’t trust a single individual to kill,” he said, noting the Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war and a 12-person jury the power to sentence someone to death.

As outlined in “Theodore and Woodrow,” Napolitano said Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson are largely responsible for changing America from a nation championing limited government to one saddled with a government growing beyond anyone’s ability to control it.

“(They) shared the same view and that was this: the Constitution is not the supreme law of the land. It does not limit the government to the powers that have been delegated to it. Rather it unleashes the government to do whatever it wants except that which is expressly prohibited in the document,” said Napolitano. “Now that is not just an academic argument because that is turning the concept of limited government on its head.

“Every president from George Washington to William McKinley, Roosevelt’s predecessor, with the exception of Lincoln during the Civil War, accepted the idea that the federal government is one of limited powers and it can only do what the Constitution authorizes it to do,” he said. “When Roosevelt and Wilson switched to that (and) turned it on its head, they changed radically the size and scope of the federal government and the relationship of the federal government to individual Americans.”

So what did this big government push look like a century ago?

“In about a five-year period we suddenly got an income tax which they promised would never be more than three percent. Of course, it went up to 90 percent in World War II,” said Napolitano. “We got the Federal Reserve, which allows them to print worthless cash and put that into the economy. We got one of the most useless wars in American history which is World War I, basically an argument among the old, dying European monarchies about boundary lines.”

The judge says both Roosevelt and Wilson cracked down on free speech they found unhelpful to their cause and both were outspoken racists who worked to segregate the military after it had been integrated during Reconstruction.

Now that America has a full century of big government policies coming out of Washington, can this trend be reversed and how could that happen?  Napolitano said it won’t happen anytime soon but will eventually happen but in a most unpleasant way.

“I’ve argued on Fox and elsewhere that we don;t have two political parties anymore.  We have one political party, the big government party.  It has a Republican wing that likes war and deficits and corporate welfare.  It has a Democratic wing that likes war and taxes and individual welfare.  Both wings have a single goal and that is staying in power.

“Honestly, it would take half the Congress and the White House with a small government, maximum individual liberty, Ron Paul-like mentality for these changes to come about,” he said.

“If they don’t come about peacefully, they’ll probably come about by other means. Sooner or later the federal government is going to run out of money, and so many people will be dependent upon the federal cash which will stop coming that they will all kinds of horrific things in order to eat and to live,” Napolitano said.  “At this point, there probably will be a revolution which will end up in a small government or many small governments or a totalitarian and then the totalitarian will probably be overthrown.

“I’m not suggesting this is going to happen tomorrow. I’m not saying I want it to happen. I’m just a student and teacher of history suggesting that is the natural result of government overextending itself,” he said. “It’s how Rome died. It’s how the European socialist states are dying, and we’re not far behind.”

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

Dear Friend, One of Barack Obama's top gun ban extremists in the Senate - Dianne Feinstein - recently introduced a bill that's part of the Obama agenda to strip you of your Second Amendment rights. Feinstein's sweeping new gun ban would: -- BAN tens of millions of commonly owned rifles, shotguns and handguns; -- BAN all magazines capable of holding just 11 rounds or more; and -- PUT YOU IN PRISON if you pass down or sell any banned firearm to family or friends without going through government red tape. According to Feinstein, this gun ban would NEVER expire. It would cause massive damage to the Second Amendment…and our freedom would NEVER fully recover if it passes. That's why I'm urging you right now to send an emergency contributi... NRA-ILA is going to need every generous dollar from every gun-owning patriot like you if we're going to have the strength to beat back this vicious and unconstitutional attack on our Second Amendment rights. You should have seen Feinstein gloating at her press conference about how she had no problem taking NRA members head on. You should have heard it when she had the AUDACITY to say that God was on her side in this unholy crusade to strip you of your fundamental and sacred Right to Keep and Bear Arms! We need to show Dianne Feinstein, Barack Obama, and every one of their gun ban pals on Capitol Hill that when they come for our guns...when they brand us as criminals...when they take aim at the heart of our freedom… WE WILL FIGHT BACK! And I'm counting on you, right now, to help me and NRA-ILA lead this once-in-a-lifetime fight! NRA-ILA is the only gun rights organization with an office just steps from Capitol Hill...working around the clock to defeat gun bans like this in Congress. We're the only group with a nationwide grassroots army capable of crushing Feinstein's bill and saving our firearm freedoms. But NRA-ILA cannot fight a battle this big without you and that's w... If we lose this one, we lose EVERYTHING. Thank you for your loyalty to the cause of freedom. Together, we will save the Second Amendment from this brutal attack. In Freedom, Chris Chris W. Cox Executive Director www.NRAILA.org