Certifigate Will Not Go Away, Barry!

[Your Uncle Sam]

---

CERTIFIGATE

'Irrefutable' proof of Obama forgery

Document details show typewriter hadvariabletype way back in 1961?

---

Posted: July 17, 2011
5:20 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WND

 

NEW YORK – Unless the typewriter used to type Barack Obama's purported Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" in 1961 was magically capable of producing different size and shaped images with the exact same key, the document released by theWhiteHouseApril 27 is a forgery, says a professional typographer with 50 years experience.

"Steel-stamped letters do not expand to larger sizes and morph into different styles of type," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND.

As WND previously reported,it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obamabirthcertificateto have been typed by one typewriter, according to Irey.

Jerome Corsi's new book,  "Where's the Birth Certificate?", is now ...

"These are irrefutable proofs of forgery," he said.

His newest analysis suggests the document was assembled from images of letters or words taken from other documents.

"The forger who produced the Obama Hawaii long-form birth certificate may have thought that all typewriter typeface styles were alike," he said.

"To get his letters, the forger must have understood that he needed to copy the old typewriter styles," he continued. "So the forger probably scanned a bunch of old birth certificates, without realizing that the letters in the old files were from different typewriter styles. That's why the letters in the forged document do not match each other."

Irey used as a source document the Xerox copy of the Obama birth certificate the White House press staff handed to the press assembled in the White House pressroom on April 27, as seen in Exhibit 1:

 

 

From this source, Irey extracted individual typed letters and prepared a chart listing each typed letter that appeared in the document identified in the chart with a unique number identifier, as seen in Exhibit 2:

 

 

In Exhibit 3, Irey advanced his previously published analysis by comparing the two letters, #144 and #146, used to form the name "Barack" in Box 8, "Name of the Father," and explained they are not identical, such that the one is significantly bigger than the other.

"Why then is #144 significantly bigger than #146, if the same typewriter key struck both?" Irey asked.

 

 

Exhibit 3: 1st set typeface comparisons from the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House, April 27, 2011

Exhibit 4 extends the analysis to four additional letters from the Obama birth certificate, with the width of each letter measured and compared to make clear the size difference in the typeface.

As seen with the "s" in "Hussein" compared to the "s" in "Stanley," the typeface differs not only in size, but also in kind, with the serif differences leading to the conclusion that more than one typewriter was used to create the document.

 

 

Exhibit 4: 2nd set typeface comparisons from the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House, April 27, 2011

In Exhibit 5, Irey notes that the two different "t" letters in the word "Student" are particularly noteworthy.

"As a typographer I could see no reason for a different style of letter within the same word," Irey commented regarding the two different "t" letters used in typing the word "Student," a peculiarity seen in the last example presented in Exhibit 5.

 

 

Exhibit 5: 3rd set typeface comparisons from the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House, April 27, 2011

In Exhibit 6, Irey summarizes his argument: "If all the letters are from the same typewriter, why don't they match?"

 

 

Exhibit 6: Typeface analysis: Summary of argument Obama long-form birth certificate, White House Release, April 27, 2011.

"It's been some 30 years since we have used typewriters to produce documents," Irey noted. "Computers have replaced the typewriter and give us great advantages in document preparation. There is no need to understand the old typewriter – except when you need to forge a typewritten document."

Read more:'Irrefutable' proof of Obama forgeryhttp://www.wnd.com/?pageId=322389#ixzz1SSSCn7Gr

[Peter Meis]

Sometimes I wonder why there is not more comment on some of the messages that appear here. I get the same thing from relatives and friends when I post some comment or analysis of something of current interest. It is as if I am talking to myself, which I may be.

A comment from anyone is as rare as the truth about ANYTHING from the usurper, often called the president of this country.

Bill O'Reilly is as big a liar as anyone, and is a big liberal, to boot. When someone on his program sent in a question about the other liar's Social Security number being from Connecticut, he stated that Barack, Sr., lived there for awhile, and sometimes a child would get an S.S. number because of the parent. That could happen IF the parent lived in the state. I got numbers for my three children while I lived in Arizona, where I still do, but, there is no record of BHO, Sr. ever living in Connecticut.

The imposter's number is from 1975, while the sequence in which it is from is from 1977-1979. The number that he has is the same as one issued to a person who died in Hawaii, but, which was not of interest to anyone else, so, no action was taken, and the number was available to anyone who wanted to use it for fraudulent purposes, which it apparently is.

The imposter was working in a Baskin-Robbins in 1975 and would have needed an S.S. number at the time, so, someone lifted the one not in use, which belonged to the dead person.

By law, an S.S. number can never be used by two people, ever.

[Worried Grammie]

Anyone currently serving in the Senate or House who is running for president in 2012 who does not have the backbone and honor to expose this fraud and deceit will not receive my vote.  There is no way our current politicians can be unaware of this fraud, so looking the other way and ignoring this flagrant lie is unacceptable.  Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann talk a good talk, but do not walk the walk.  If the American people don't stand up and march, shut down DC and make our voices heard, we will only have more of the same.  This is the biggest and most corrupt hoax ever perpetrated on our country and the world, and these evil ones must be stopped before we totally lose our country. 

[valerie eggers]

We all pretty much know this, particularly here on this site. The question is what can we do about it when our legislators will not act on the behalf of our Consitution and us?

[Lorene]

I think that this certificate was just another stick in the eye of America by Obama. It's a "take that! and I dare you to do anything about it."  Sadly it's working for him as courage has left the building.