Barack Hussein Obama’s Dark Triad…

[Richard Allan Jenni]

Pamela Black, a masters student, wrote as published in a Student Society Publication of a European Association of Psychology and Law in June, 2011:“The Dark Triad is a set of three personality constructs: Machiavellianism, subclinical narcissism, and subclinical psychopathy, which have been deemed to be socially aversive. That is, individuals who possess characteristics of any of the personality disorders that make up the Dark Triad are likely to be selfish, possess a grandiose sense of importance, and feel an increased sense of entitlement. Further, these individuals are often pre-occupied with dominance and power and will use aggressive tactics such as manipulation and exploitation to get whatever it is that they feel that they deserve.”

 

She defines Machiavellianism as “as a manipulative personality, one who believes that the ends justify the means regardless of the human suffering. These individuals are arrogant, calculating and will use whatever means necessary, such as deception and undermining the trust of others, to achieve their goals… Machiavellians do not see themselves as selfish or entitled- and are excellent at rationalizing their behavior.”

 

Pamela further states, “Narcissism is a personality disorder grandiosity, and superiority. Individuals with narcissism often experience an increased sense of entitlement, a need to succeed, and a craving to be admired. This need to be admired often leads narcissists to high profile and stressful jobs, and because image is so important to narcissists they perform exceptionally well in difficult situations. While narcissists perform well in the workplace, they are not team players and are only interested in their own accomplishments. Individuals with this disorder will use whatever means necessary to get what they desire, including the use of deception and manipulation of others.”

 

Finally, for my purpose today, she explains “Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by a cold and emotionally void personality as well as antisocial behavior. Personality traits common to psychopaths are high impulsivity, thrill seeking, glibness, low empathy, and recklessness. Psychopaths are superficially charming, are skilled liars, and they often use these skills to manipulate and exploit others. Further, they do not feel remorse or guilt after deceiving or manipulating others.”

 

I don’t pretend that as a masters student, Pamela qualifies as an expert witness- but she has succinctly explained the “Dark Triad” personality.

 

The Machiavellian characteristics manipulative, arrogant and calculating fit Barry perfectly. His rise to the US Presidency is textbook Machiavellian achievement- not that he didn’t have help.    

 

Also, I have long described Barack Obama as a flaming (incurable?) narcissist. He is preoccupied with his projected public image- and his insatiable appetite to be admired best exemplified by his constant appearances on glamorous talk shows having little or nothing to do with the US Presidency.

 

Finally, I really do believe that Barry is a psychopath. Who can deny that he uses his superficially charming personality to win votes and influence people?” Moreover, Barry is an accomplished liar who has told so many lies that he now finds it hard to keep them all logically arranged in his criminal mind. In his more notable slips of the tongue, he has admitted being “from Kenya” and has even mentioned his “Muslim faith” to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. Without delivering prepared comments via teleprompter, he can be as unpredictable before a live microphone as Joe Biden. His entire political outlook is based on the end justifying the means- his whimsical executive orders often crossing the line into unconstitutional territory. He sees himself as a one-man-band without regard for Congress or the Supreme Court- yet he will use both as a tool when it suits his purposes.

 

I have often mentioned Barry’s illegal trip to Kenya as a US Senator where he actively campaigned for his Luo communist Muslim cousin Raila Odinga- a lost presidential bid that resulted in the murder of hundreds of Christians. I would still like to know why Donald Young was murdered- if not to cover up for Barry’s gay lifestyle before his run for the US Presidency.

 

Barry, you personify an extremely dark triad- and I do believe Larry Sinclair’s 2008 testimony before the National Press Club about your homosexuality and illicit drug use was indeed accurate. Furthermore, “Fast and Furious,” “You Didn’t Build That” and ObamaCare fit neatly into your “Dark Triad” modus operandi. And it doesn’t get much darker than your long international trail of lies, drug addiction, homosexuality and murder. You are a narcissistic megalomaniac whose selfish ends will justify even the vilest means.

[Annette Akerman]

YEP!!  I've been saying it for years now.  And with this latest trouncing by Romney in the debate, you can count on a VERY serious retaliation by 0bama.  He cannot simply cancel the next 2 debates, but he will find a way to do so by hook or by crook.  Furthermore, with the New Yorker Magazine showing Romney lecturing an empty chair, you can be guaranteed he will do something not only foolish, but foolishly reckless very soon.  He is rapidly running out of time, which makes him all the more desperate and dangerous.  With the power he has and intends to hold on to, you can be guaranteed the man is lethal.

[Richard Allan Jenni]

Yes, I love this guy!

[Richard Allan Jenni]

The direction our country is headed- and I know from personal experience when police entered my home by armed intimidation when an anonymous tipster heard my poor demented mother ranting:

WND EXCLUSIVE

JUDGE OKS SOCIAL WORKERS' INVASION OF HOMESCHOOLERS

Search ruled 'voluntary' despite threat armed officers would seize children

Published: 12 hours ago

by BOB UNRUHEmail | Archive

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after spending nearly three decades writing on a wide range of issues for several Upper Midwest newspapers and the Associated Press. Sports, tornadoes, homicidal survivalists, and legislative battles all fell within his bailiwick. His scenic photography has been used commercially, and he sometimes plays in a church worship band.More ↓

 Subscribe to author feed

• inShare2
• 
• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

Ads by Google

• Dialysis & Heart AttacksLearn About the Dangers! Experienced Attorneys Standing By.DialysisInjuries.com

Police cars screech to a halt outside your door, six deputies approach along with two social workers who warn they have information from an anonymous tipster and threaten that unless you allow them to enter RIGHT NOW, the armed officers will take your children away from you.

So your decision to allow the authorities to enter is completely voluntary?

Ads by Google

• Apply for HARP 2.0 Today"A +" Rated BBB Direct Lender. Apply Online. No SSN Needed.www.harp2mortgageloan.com
• Long Term Care Ins6 Quotes,Free Guide & Consultation. Explore Your Insurance Options Now.www.ltcfp.com/long-term-care-quotes

That’s the determination of a federal judge who has relieved two social workers – Rhonda Cash and Jenna Cramer – of liability for their actions in a case brought by homeschooling parents John and Tiffany Loudermilk in Arizona.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals previously ruled that deputies Joshua Ray, Joseph Sousa, Richard Gagnon and Michael Danner had qualified immunity for their role in the 2005 confrontation with the Loudermilks, the parents of five children.

Jim Mason, a senior counsel for the Home School Legal Defense Association’s litigation team, which represents the Loudermilks, explained that in 2005, the couple was confronted at their door by authorities investigating a two-month-old anonymous allegation that their home was unsafe.

Faced with losing their children, Mason said, the Loudermilks opened their door to the investigators, “and the allegation was quickly proven false.”

However, the Loudermilks’ civil rights lawsuit against the social workers and the deputies, citing Fourth and 14th Amendment rights, has faced an uphill battle.

“We argued that the search of the Loudermilks’ home was coerced because the social workers used the threat of taking their children to gain access,” Mason said. “Both the social workers and sheriff’s deputies argued that they were immune to such claims because the Loudermilks ‘voluntarily’ opened their home to be investigated.”

The district court ruled in the Loudermilks’ favor in 2010, but the deputies then obtained a ruling from the 9th Circuit, which said the deputies were entitled in immunity.

Then the lower court, which originally concluded that such searches were not voluntary, changed its mind, Mason said.

“While the sheriff’s deputies had arrived on the scene late and were not insisting to enter the home, the social workers were. It was the social workers who claimed that their visit was an ‘emergency’ despite the allegation being two months old. The social workers, not the deputies, threatened to take the Loudermilk children into custody. Despite our response to the social workers’ request, the district court ruled that the social workers were also immune from violating the Loudermilks’ rights based on the ruling of the Ninth Circuit in favor of the deputies,” he said.

Mason said the organization now is considering whether there should be an appeal.

“Based on the facts and the law, it is our view that the social workers should not be entitled to the same benefit of the doubt that the Ninth Circuit afforded the deputies,” he said.

The HSLDA has noted in court papers: “For 40 terrifying minutes, this homeschooling couple had asserted their Fourth Amendment right to be free from an unreasonable search of their home. The two investigative social workers were eventually joined by six uniformed sheriff’s deputies who were called because the social workers considered the Loudermilks to be ‘uncooperative.’”

But the HSLDA said the Loudermilks were forced to allow the search when the social workers “played their ace-in-the-hole,” warning, “If you don’t let us in immediately, we will take your children into state custody.”

The court filing explains that the still-anonymous tipster told authorities that there was a danger to the children in the new home, but social services took some two months to respond.

“In the two months between receiving the anonymous report and arriving unannounced on the Loudermilks’ front porch, social services clearly never believed that the situation needed emergency intervention,” HSLDA asserted. “No one ever asked a judge for a court order. But when it came time for the social workers to complete their investigation, the family’s Fourth Amendment rights just got in the way.”

According to court filings, the Loudermilks had been building their dream home in Arizona. They eventually obtained permission from the county to move in, even though there were minor projects to be finished.

One social worker left a business card and later explained when the parents contacted the office that there had been an anonymous tip. A visit was scheduled for the social worker to investigate what allegedly was a “danger” to the children two months later.

However, the family consulted a lawyer who warned the county that the county itelf had given proper permission for the family to move in.

When social workers Cash and Cramer appeared at the home unannounced some weeks later, they threatened to take the family’s five children.

The petition says Cash “appeared to believe that her simple inability to determine the children’s living conditions was sufficient grounds for her to remove the children from their parents.”

That’s even though the social workers were allowed to talk to the children to see that they were fine.

Nevertheless, the threats from Cash continued.

“Faced with unrelenting ultimatum that the officers would physically remove the children from the home unless they were admitted, together with a significant show of force, John felt that he had no option besides allowing the search of his home. He believed that he would be arrested and the children removed if he continued to refuse. … Tiffany believed her children would be immediately removed from the home if she did not allow the social workers and officers to search her home.”

The ultimate search took only minutes and uncovered no issues, showing that the “tip” was wrong.

U.S. District Judge Earl H. Carroll previously concluded the lawsui... against the social workers, sheriff and deputies would be allowed to continue, because the social workers’ concerns were based on “an anonymous tip that the … Loudermilk children were being neglected and that plaintiffs’ home was uninhabitable.”

However, the judge said that under federal law, an anonymous tip “without more, does not constitute probable cause.”