If at First You Don’t Succeed Barry, Lie, Lie Again

[Rocky Apache]

Obama gave us taunts, insults and attacks from the bully pulpit

If at First You Don’t Succeed Barry, Lie, Lie Again

By Jayme Evans Sunday, April 4, 2010

“Part of the undertow in the coming election is going to be, uh,
President Obama’s leadership. And the Republicans would make a case, and
a lot of Independents will buy this argument, listen, he just hasn’t
been, I mean look at the health care bill, his number one priority and
it
took him forever to get it through and he had to compromise it to death
and a version of… listen, he’s a nice person and he’s very articulate,
this is what’s going to be used against him, but he couldn’t sell
watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied down in
traffic.”
- 3/7/10 - Disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather speculating on what
a failure to pass health care legislation would mean for Obama.


In the wake of their arguably “successful” and overwhelmingly unpopular
government takeover of the US
health
care system, which also succeeded in hopelessly dividing the
entire
country, you’d think that if Barack Obama
and Democrats were interested
at all in governing, rather than enslaving us through a Chicago-style
dictatorship, they’d tone down their rhetorical attacks just a bit. But,
recent events indicate they have no intention of doing so and that the
attacks are increasing.

Since his campaign, Democrats have tried on several occasions to label
opposition to specific Obama policy decisions as the unfortunate
by-product of vehement, deep-seated racism. These baseless accusations
have continued to surface every so often, whenever Democrats feel
vulnerable. And, as the debate
over health care wore on, it became
increasingly clear that, although they may win the policy fight,
Democrats already lost the debate long ago. So, the racist attacks
began.

First, they manufactured that pathetic spectacle for the cameras where
black House Democrats marched arm-in-arm with Nancy Pelosi to the
capitol, through jeering crowds, trying to equate protesters of her
trillion-dollar lies and chicanery with the turbulence of the
African-American struggle for equality back in the 1960s.

Then there was the incident where Rep. Emanuel Cleaver was allegedly spat
on. Although dissenting opinions abound, the video that I saw never
showed him immediately wipe someone else’s saliva from his face, glasses
or anywhere else, as one instinctively would if they were spat upon
intentionally. What I saw was the Congressman react by ducking his head
when an angry protester cupped his hands and yelled at the top of his
lungs mere inches from his ear as well as a female police officer and
then, when he realized a camera was rolling, pretend to wipe something
off of his face.

Although his election was a numerical impossibility without white,
independent voters, Slanderer-In-Chief Barack Obama is unfortunately not
above the fray, having recently engaged in a bit of race-baiting
himself.
Cognizant of how angry the electorate was after they were forced to
accept his un-Constitutional expansion of federal power, he embarked on a
slew of campaign stops that were ostensibly designed to convince
skeptical Americans of the merits of ObamaCare. What we got instead were
more taunts, insults and attacks from the bully pulpit, with Obama daring
opponents to repeal the legislation and mocking those who believe that
he
pledged to uphold the US

Constitution
instead of wiping with it after Chris Matthews is done
kissing his behind.

Matthews continues to attribute racist motives to Constitutional
conservatives who oppose Obama, yet he couldn’t even feign surprise
during his March 7, 2010 show when disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather
opined that Obama"Couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state
trooper and he lied(sic) down in traffic.”

Mr. Obama has also given interviews of late, characterizing those who
oppose his
policies
as racist, conspiracy nuts who actually oppose him because of his skin
color (which I’d like to remind you is half-white) or because (according
to Obama) he wasn’t born in this country, a blatant misrepresentation of
the argument made by so-called “birthers” about his eligibility. As one
of those so-called birthers, I question, not whether Barack Obama was
born in the US, but whether his birth, wherever that was, qualifies him
as a “natural-born” US citizen, as only “natural born” citizens qualify
to be president.

Not content with a few cheap shots, Obama and Democrats have now
embarked
on a smear campaign
the likes of which we’ve never seen. Anyone who
questions Obama’s motives or agenda, anyone who is associated with the
Tea
Party
movement and anyone who disapproves of his installation of a socialist
dictatorship with its “carrot and stick” approach is to be labeled as a
violent racist.

Democrats seem to be operating on the premise that if you can’t silence
the message, just shoot the messenger. Unfortunately for them, there are
simply too many Paul Reveres this time. Too many voices to silence and
too many Americans who still believe in their Constitution to allow this
garbage to continue. I’m not shutting up, I’m not intimidated by a deaf
congress, executive thuggery, or baseless charges of racism. I can
articulate specific socialist policy decisions I disagree with and which
provisions of our founding documents these policies violate. And my
voice, along with millions of others, will be heard louder than ever in
November. Until then, if you have any concrete evidence that my
opposition to Obama’s objectionable policies is based on anything other
than his Marxism, then put it out there for the world to see. Otherwise,
I suggest you shut your pie hole.

[Oregon Country Girl]

Absolutely...there are millions upon millions of Americans who are used to "freedom of speech," they are not about to "sit down and shut up." They will only continue to grow. It's freedom loving Americans who have made this country great.