TSA, under the direction of Napolitano, consent of Obama, collecting names, personal information, labeling them as potential "domestic extremists."

[Sandra]

TSA, under the direction of Napolitano, consent of Obama, collecting names, personal information, labeling them as potential "domestic extremists."

Taking names, Napolitano style

 By Doug Hagmann  Tuesday, December 21, 2010





Did you see the Washington Post this morning? That was the one
sentence e-mail I received yesterday from my DHS contact who alerted me
to the
DHS/TSA
memorandum about the domestic intelligence agency’s creating and
maintaining a list of individuals who were determined to be “interfering”
with the enhanced airport TSA screening procedures through their
objections or “opting out” of such procedures.

In my November 23rd report
titled
DHS making a list, checking it twice, I wrote that the DHS, through
the arm of the TSA, under the direction of Napolitano and with the full
consent of Obama, was collecting the names and personal information of
such individuals, labeling them as potential “domestic extremists.”


Meanwhile, the very same agency was busily averting an uprising by air
travelers and a potential public relations nightmare by temporarily
suspending their draconian security measures during one of the busiest
travel times of the year.

This tactic was first disclosed by

Alex Jones and was widely reported at airports across the country,
further confirming that the measures enacted are all about the total
behavioral control of the populace and have little to do with air
security. Mockingly and in what could be considered borderline
delusional, the TSA and the corporate media actually reported that the
“opt-out” day had turned into a TSA appreciation day.

Monday’s edition of the Washington Post featured an article titled

Monitoring America, which was the result of an investigation by
columnists Dana Priest, William Arkin and staff researcher Julie Tate,
which confirms that the U.S. Government ” is building a vast repository
[of the names and personal information] of Americans and legal residents
who are not accused of any crime.” Inclusion on the list appears
to involve a rather broad and arbitrary definition of  someone acting
suspiciously as interpreted by a law enforcement officer or even a
neighbor.

The Washington Post article identifies the collection of names and
profiles of Americans as the new Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting
Initiative, or SAR for short. When a “suspicious” incident is observed or
reported, information about you is collected, either through direct
questioning or by more covert means, such as running your license plate
through a state DMV database or even photographic surveillance for facial
recognition purposes.

What happens next, however, is perhaps the most disturbing aspect to this
story.

Even if the reported activity is deemed to be completely innocent and
harmless, the data collected about you remains stored in the SAR
“Guardian” database indefinitely. Accordingly, the DHS will be
able to quickly compile in-depth profiles on you whenever they determine
it to be necessary despite being completely innocent or cleared of any
crime or criminal behavior.

While government officials are busily assuring the public that all
officials with access to the data have been trained in privacy rules and
the penalties for breaking them, (and of course we’ve all seen how well
that works)  they fail to address what should be the most obvious
concern of all. Why are our own domestic intelligence agencies creating
and maintaining files on law abiding U.S. citizens who have not been
accused of any crime and who have been cleared of any suspicious activity
at all?

The Stasi-style infringement on the rights to law abiding American
citizens is nearly as breathtaking and those who are accepting of it. DHS
Secretary Janet Napolitano, the newly hired virtual Wal-Mart greeter,
recently spoke to a group of first responders , stating that “the old
view that ‘if we fight the terrorists abroad, we won’t have to fight them
here’ is just that, the old view.”

Indeed it is, and we have this and the last three decades of presidential
administrations and arguably treasonous congressional bodies to thank. We
will be most certainly “fighting them here” because of our unsecured
borders, lack of immigration and visa enforcement, and the globalist
agenda that drives the open-door doctrine that is so perilous to our
security and sovereignty.

As I stated in my original report, the new DHS procedures have everything
to do with control and conditioning and nothing to do with actual
security. The TSA enhancements and the DHS databases are noticeably on
the uptick, taking aim at law abiding American citizens who threaten the
globalist agenda or the allegedly non-existent, once conspiratorial “New
World Order” under global governance doctrine.

Perhaps those who found my report of the DHS list making too “far out” to
consider credible can accept an almost identical account in the
Washington Post, which is definitely worthy of the read. That is,
of course, only after they are finished with snooping in the aisles at
their local Wal-Mart and have returned the Napolitano approved
complementary Dick Tracy disguise kit to the customer service center
before departing the store.



http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/31331