"[T]he [Obama deficit] commission's report

[Sandra]

"[T]he [Obama deficit] commission's report ... is well worth a look. In addition to suggesting some much-needed reforms, including changes to the budget process and simplification of the tax
code, it clearly shows, despite its talk of 'painful' choices, that
eliminating the federal deficit and reining in the national debt does
not require radical change. Which is too bad, because even if Congress
implemented every cut suggested by the report, the federal government
would still be far too big, rife with programs that are unnecessary,
unconstitutional or both." --columnist Jacob Sullum

"More troubling than WikiLeaks' latest revelation of US secrets ... is the Obama administration's weak, wrong-headed and erratic response. Unfortunately, the administration has acted
consistently with its demonstrated unwillingness to assert and defend US
interests across a wide range of threats, such as Iran and North Korea,
which, ironically, the leaked cables amply document. ... His secretary
of state does not comprehend that America is the subject of the attack,
his department of defense is not interested in defending us, and the
president himself seems utterly indifferent to the whole affair. All of
this underscores the real problem. It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately
imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration,
which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too
often unwilling to act to thwart them." --former UN ambassador John
Bolton

"A month after [Barack Obama's] inauguration, the North Koreans tested a ballistic missile. Since then, they've revealed yet another nuclear program and attacked South Korea just weeks after
Obama's embarrassing failure to win a trade deal from Seoul during an
official visit. Meanwhile, according to WikiLeaks and other sources, the
North Koreans have been selling ballistic missiles to the Iranians. And
what are Obama's global priorities? The START treaty, Israeli
settlements, and climate change." --columnist Jonah Goldberg

"Which do you think is less expensive, not to mention preferable: a cure for cancer, Alzheimer's disease and diabetes, or caring for people with these diseases? Wouldn't it be better medical and
public policy to direct more resources toward finding a cure for
diseases that cost a lot to treat than to rely on a government insurance
program, such as Obamacare, which seeks mainly to help pay the bills
for people after they become ill?" --columnist Cal Thomas

Patriot Post Article