The democrat machine steals the Republican ideology of smaller government and gives it to Obama

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

to call his own! There is NOTHING the democrats won't do or say to stay in POWER!

And the media will call Obama the greatest politician since Caesar.

Does Obama’s Latest Ruse Plays Us For Fools?

Posted on January 13, 2012 by Conservative Byte

`

`

Obama steps away from his dual teleprompters

to use a helpful chart detailing how to cut the size of government

and try to fool We the People.

`

`

After a year of interminable feuds with congressional Republicans who made smaller, cheaper federal government a political crusade, President Obama on Friday signaled his intention to do some sail-trimming of his own.

Obama asked Congress for the authority to consolidate the roles of several federal agencies which he said would lead to streamlined services and a smaller government workforce.

The proposal comes at a politically opportune moment for the president, who has faced sustained Republican criticism that his administration has failed to tame a bloated federal bureaucracy.

With an eye squarely on his reelection campaign, Obama announced that he would initially focus on merging sprawling entities that deal with small businesses in a bid to save $3 billion by eliminating more than 1,000 jobs over the next decade.

Almost a year ago, Obama promised in his State of the Union address to create a leaner, more efficient federal bureaucracy. Since then, Republicans — both on Capitol Hill and in the presidential campaign — have charged that the administration’s health-care, environmental and financial reforms have added layers of red tape and costs at the worse possible time.

For a president who has spent months pushing his $447 billion jobs bills, the proposal sought to establish that he is also committed to reducing spending over the long term. His announcement came a day after he notified Congress of his intent to raise the national debt ceiling by $1.2 trillion to cover increased U.S. spending commitments.

Obama noted before an audience of small-business owners at the White House that the federal bureaucracy includes five different entities involved in housing and more than a dozen that regulate food safety.

“No business or nonprofit leader would allow this kind of duplication or unnecessary complexity in their operations,” Obama said. “So why is it okay in our government? It’s not. It has to change.”

Obama is scheduled to deliver this year’s State of the Union address on Jan. 24, and Republican critics, while embracing the spirit of paring the government’s size, questioned whether Obama was scrambling to make good on his pledge with his reelection effort looming.

“A year after raising the issue . . . it’s interesting to see the president finally acknowledge that Washington is out of control,” said Don Stewart, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

Other lawmakers expressed concern that the reorganization could harm U.S. trade policy, noting that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, which is among the agencies the president would consolidate, was established to serve a distinct role.

In a joint statement, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) questioned whether the legislation would hamper the government’s ability “to aggressively open new markets to American-made goods and services and create U.S. jobs.”

Yet the White House was banking on muted opposition from GOP lawmakers, because the consolidation proposal goes right to the Republicans’ core ideological belief that the government is too large.

The audacity of the liberal progressive democrat machine continues to confound the conservatives and Republicans because the conservatives and Republicans have a frame of reference that includes honesty. The other side is not hampered by any of those human conditions of frailty which would include integrity and honesty.

`

[PHILIP SCHNEIDER]

Until the TEA PARTY rises to the level of a viable "third party", there IS no where else to direct our invective and ask for politically redirected comfort.

The Republicans at this point are beginning to expose an inner party rift creating a possibility that maybe soon we'll have a third choice of political will to choose a different direction for our government.

This presidential election cycle has a clear cut candidate who has chosen to break with the time honored Republican hierarchy position . . . . . Ron Paul carries that new mantle.

[drkate]

This is not a republican mantra, it is a constitutional mantra.  Why do you keep framing everything as republican vs democrat?  that paradigm is of no use.  Let's put it this way:  all republicans and democrats are anti-constitutional.  With the exception of Ron Paul!