Someone's..... In deep trouble

[Gordon Ray Kissinger]

Our New DICTATOR-IN-CHIEF 

 May Be In Deep Trouble...

 

 

                               Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.

  

 According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevit... Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.

 

 Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run

headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.

 

The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by

Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling. 

 

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship

between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government.  

Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued

to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional

principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.

 

Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one

enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity,

and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court,

Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'

 

                                         Apparently, the Court has had enough.

 

The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. 

 

A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially

cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue. First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal

government from forcing citizens to purchase something.  And no, this is

not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance,

as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. 

 

The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from

such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could

opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.

 

           In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

 

Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information

 concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions

about his eligibility for the office of President. 

 

The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue.  This information

involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut,

while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.

  

                                  And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

 

Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of

interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many

administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. 

 

Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes

close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration,

not even during the Nixon years.  

 

Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the

jokers that populate this Administration.

 

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful

decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona.  

 

That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave,

given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.

 

And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards

tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder

Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. 

The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.

 

A whistle-blower, who resigned from the DOJ, is now charging Holder with

the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who

are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who

have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

 

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that

is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution

and the Bill of Rights.

 

--

     Surely something must be terribly wrong with a man who seems to be far more concerned with a Jew building a house or an extra room in Israel than with a Muslim building a nuclear bomb in Iran

_____________________________________________________________________

Thanks to Yitchok D., for sharing the above post content.

[Sandra]

He needs to face fraud and treason charges and the sooner the better! I will not hold my breath waiting for the Supreme Court

[Katy]

When,, is the Supreme Court supposed to hear , and rule on these issues?