Complete Charlie Foxtrot: DOJ fails to protect military voters

[Sandra]

Complete Charlie Foxtrot: DOJ fails to protect military voters

Source: Election Law Center
URL Source: http://electionlawcenter.com/2010/1 ... fails-to-protect-military-vote
Published: Oct 10, 2010
Author: Christian Adams

Barely three weeks before the election, the Department of Justice has opened "urgent" discussions with New York. New York has failed to mail ballots
to military voters. This is the latest breakdown in DOJ enforcement of
the MOVE Act.

The MOVE Act required ballots to mail out on September 18. New York obtained a waiver allowing the ballots to mail
October 1. But that didn't happen across a sizeable portion of the
Empire State - including all of New York City and Westchester County.
On October 2, the failure to comply with the deadline should have been
known. Fox News breaks the story on
October 10, that the DOJ is in "urgent" discussions with New York. One
wonders, as has been the case with the 2010 saga of military voting
enforcement, why the DOJ isn't in urgent "litigation."

The 2008 failure to protect military voters was documented

here.

An even bigger debacle is emerging in 2010. It has been documented here and here and here and here.

The most amazing side story to the 2010 mess is that it occurred while Texas Senator John Cornyn has

blocked the nomination of the number two man at Justice - Deputy Attorney General
nominee James Cole - specifically because of the military voting mess
created by the lack of aggressive enforcement by the Voting Section. It
was no secret that Cole wasn't going to move unless DOJ changed their
ways.

Even after the hold was placed on James Cole, inaction and delay characterized DOJ enforcement. Private groups, such as the
Military Voter Protection Project, uncovered failures to mail military
ballots instead of the DOJ. Instead of fixing the problem after the
hold was placed on Cole, the problem grew worse - almost as if the
Department was rebuking Senator Cornyn.

Worse, DOJ meetings with Hill staffers turned into a useless exercise in spin. DOJ officials claimed they were busy at work enforcing the law, while the
facts demonstrated otherwise. Disbelieving Senators and Congressmen
have grown exasperated and have promised that either a housecleaning is
in order of those responsible for the mess, or Cole will remain in
private practice for a very long time. Upcoming elections promise to
strengthen Cornyn's hand regarding the Cole hold. And the whole mess
could have been avoided.

In sum, here is the history of the 2010 military voting mess:

* In early 2010, Justice officials address state election officials.
They reveal an aversion to aggressive litigation to protect military
voting rights. State officials tell the Washington Times they simply
could not believe what was being said. States went away thinking they
didn't face any real consequences for failures to comply with the MOVE
Act.

* Also in early 2010, DOJ officials promote the idea that a 2010 waiver would be permanent for future elections, including the 2012 Presidential election. Spencer Overton and the
manager who addressed state election officials promoted this crazed
legal view in direct conflict with the law.

* Pentagon officials sent draft waiver guidance to the DOJ. The guidance would govern
standards for granting a waiver and put states on notice what would be
eligible for a waiver. Instead of responding to the Pentagon, the draft
gathers dust on DOJ desks. No guidance was ever issued to states
because DOJ failed to provide input to the Pentagon.

* Many states were obviously not going to comply with the new MOVE Act because
they did not amend their state laws before the close of their
legislative sessions. DOJ response? Silence. Instead of suing
noncompliant states, the Justice Department waited, watched and did
nothing.

* After waiver applications were denied to states like Wisconsin, many states were obviously in noncompliance with the MOVE Act, and there was no possibility of a waiver. DOJ Response?
Silence. Instead of filing lawsuits to force compliance, DOJ did next
to nothing. When it did act, it reached settlements with states such as
Wisconsin that rewrote explicit statutory language mandating a 45 day
ballot mailing requirement to military voters.

* Because of shortcomings in DOJ investigative methods, the Military Voter Protection
Project deploys teams of law student investigators to root out failure
to comply with the MOVE Act. Private citizens find state violations
before the DOJ does.

* When states such as Illinois and New York are discovered to be violating the law, and have totally failed to mail ballots even three weeks before the election, instead of
rushing to court, the DOJ does nothing except talk.

* Meanwhile, DOJ officials genuinely think there is no problem, that the criticism
is unfair. That alone merits a house cleaning.

Even Senator Chuck Shumer has a greater sense of urgency than the DOJ. From

FOX:
"Put these ballots on the next plane to Afghanistan. These soldiers sacrifice their lives to protect our freedoms, they should never, ever
be denied their right to vote. I wrote and passed this law so our brave
men and women overseas would no longer be disenfranchised and there is
absolutely no excuse for failing to get this done. The boards of
election should immediately get these ballots to each and every one of
our service members around the world. They should overnight them if they
have to -- no ifs, ands or buts."