California Woman Files UN Complaint Charging Feds with Genocide of Euro-American Christians

[Sandra]

California Woman Files UN Complaint Charging Feds with Genocide of Euro-American Christians

http://www.newsnet14.com/2010/09/15/california-woman-files-un-compl...

posted on 15. Sept
2010



“In the face of Hillary Clinton’s filing a UN Complaint seeking the UN
High
Commissioner for Human Rights to rule that AZ’s new immigration law
violates
“human rights”, I have filed a complaint (registered mail 9/3/10) with
that
same High Commissioner charging the US Federal Government with GENOCIDE
of
European-American Christians. I ask you to publicize this in any
ways that
you can. It truly is a powerful response that can be used to bring
Clinton,
Obama et al. into at least an interesting dilemma.

The act of GENOCIDE trumps all international and human rights laws (and
US
Public Law and the US Constitution (see attached filing), and if the
UN
Commissioner Pillay dares to rule favorably on Hillary’s complaint, she
must
*MUST* rule that the intentional destruction of Euro-American
Christians
preempts and nullifies Clinton’s lesser complaint, and all efforts
that
coddle Third World immigration, legal and illegal. Such a UN ruling
also
would stop all challenges to AZ law, and force the Feds to immediately
halt
all efforts to maintain open borders, and begin legal reparations to
restore
the majority Euro-Am Christian population. If UN Commissioner
Pillay
upholds Clinton’s complaint, but refuses to act on this GENOCIDE
complaint,
she is ruling that human rights and international laws, including the
1948
UN Convention on Genocide are no longer binding on the U.S. government
or
that European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those
laws.

That said, I ask all of you to publicize this complaint, and ask others
to
use it to file their own complaints. I believe that actions of
Clinton, AG
Holder’s DOJ, Congress, the Supreme Court and the entire Obama
Administration ­ having taken steps to subvert our Constitution and
laws,
both of which in fact SUPPORT the UN Convention on Genocide ­ must be
met
with a superseding complaint in the UN.

A California woman has filed a formal complaint with the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights charging the US federal government
with
genocide of European-American Christians through its immigration
policies.

Terry Graham sent the eight-page complaint to UN High Commissioner
Navanethem Pillay on Sept. 3, after Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton’s
filed a report with Pillay’s office claiming that the federal
government’s
legal challenge to Arizona’s new immigration law will protect “human
rights”.

In July, the US Dept. of Justice filed a lawsuit in federal district
court
seeking to nullify and prevent enforcement of Arizona’s immigration
law,
asserting the federal government alone has authority over
immigration.
Earlier, President Obama attacked Arizona’s law, saying it was “unfair”
and
potentially violated the civil rights of Hispanic citizens.

“The US Constitution, and US federal and international laws against
genocide
preempt and nullify all laws, policies and procedures – including
those
advanced illegally last month by the Executive, Legislative and
Judicial
branches of our federal government that result in the destruction of
European-Americans,” says Graham.

Graham’s complaint cites the UN Genocide Convention of 1948,
international
and human rights laws, US Public Law 95-435 and the US Constitution,
Article
I, Section 8, which gives the US Congress the power to “define and
punish…
offences against the Law of Nations.”

The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide” as “deliberately
inflicting
upon [a group] conditions of life calculated to bring about the
physical
destruction in whole or in part.” Article II further defines genocide
as
“causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” and
“imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group”, which
can
include job losses and taxation policies that cause stress and lower
birthrates. Under the Convention, which Congress adopted under US
Public
Law 95-435, “group” is defined by nation, race, ethnicity, or
religion.

Graham noted that in 1960, Euro-American Christians comprised 89% percent
of
the nation’s population, but now are minorities in many parts of the
United
States solely due to federal actions that promote massive Third
world
immigration.

In 1998, Hillary Clinton’s husband, Pres. Bill Clinton, publicly
acknowledged that the destruction of White Christian Americans was
intentional when he said, “In a little more than 50 years, there will be
no
majority race in the United States.”

In her complaint, Graham asks the UN Human Rights Commissioner to
promptly
investigate her charges and “make an immediate, formal request of the
US
federal government to place a judicial stay on all US laws,
policies,
procedures, lawsuits and legal actions that advance this genocide.”
She is
also seeking reparations as defined by the UN Genocide Convention that
“must
wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and to re-establish
the
situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had
not
been committed.”

Graham is urging others to file their own complaints with the UN
High
Commissioner for Human Rights via mail or email as soon as
possible. She
also asks that lawsuits be filed charging the US federal government
with
genocide of European-American Christians in US and courts in nations who
are
signatories to the UN Convention on Genocide.

“If the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights refuses or fails to
investigate and rule on my complaint that the U.S. federal
government’s
laws, policies, procedures and other actions are an act of genocide
against
U.S. European-American Christians, we must conclude that ”human rights
and
international law are no longer binding on the U.S. government or
that
European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those laws,
Graham
said.”

[Sandra]

As a friend said, going to world court plays into and concedes they have an authority we don't recognize.
Far better for the good people of AZ, to personally sue Hillery, she can be sued if a prima case can be made for damages. Am certain they can prove damages. As an aside, they should sue the justice dept. personnel responsible for investigating treason, to do their job,
World Court has NO authority or power here at least except that we stupidly concede. As with this lawsuit.